Coca-Cola’s inclusive business model in Africa

For the business model work I do abroad, for instance in Africa, I often need to adapt the case material a bit to the local context, when introducing the business model canvas. A really interesting case for doing that is the Coca-Cola case for Eastern Africa (everybody enjoys Coke, right?). Have a look at the worked out canvas, and I’ll explain the intriguing aspects about this case below.

The first thing people come to realize when working on the case, is that it is not Coca-Cola itself that runs the show. In fact it is a joint venture between the Coca-Cola Company and the bottler & distributor Sabco. Together they serve the larger part of Eastern Africa as Coca-Cola Sabco (CCS). Coke supplies its secret ingredient from its secret ingredient syrup factory, which is then mixed and distributed by their partner. Also Coke is involved heavily in marketing the brand (of course!). The involvement of the Coca-Cola company in the model (yellow stickies) as a whole is actually fairly limited, most of the work is done by their partner (green stickies)! Tell-tale sign of a well thought through business model.

Things get really interesting when you look at the customer segments. There are two basic segments, larger retail outlets, and small shops and restaurants. Now, the latter actually represents the largest market, but there is an inherent distribution problem there. How do you reach this large, and fragmented market in congested urban areas?

As a solution, CCS started experimenting with a system of Manual Distribution Centers (MDC’s, marked with orange stickies). These centers are owned by independent entrepreneurs who coordinate distribution to the small shops and restaurants.  MDC owners invest up front in things like crates, bottles, push carts, and they hire the labor for distribution. CCS sales agents out in the field (called resident account developers) maintain relations with the customers, and try to get their orders out with sales price arrangements. The MDC’s then deliver the order, and receive the payment.

Under this system, prices are very much under control of CCS. They determine at what price they sell to the MDC’s. Also they determine what price levels are arranged at the end with the customers. What remains in between is for the MDC.

My take-away on the case
This MDC-system is heralded as a great success of inclusive innovation by the donor agencies who helped CCS set up the MDC systems. In 2010 it was reported that MDC’s represent often over 80% of distributed sales volume in East African countries, with over 2,200 MDC’s in operation. The model gives CCS full access to a fine-grained distribution network, and control over distribution, placement, and pricing, without having to do the physical work and coordination.  A fine example of business model adaption for serving emerging markets, and a really strong case in the use of partnerships in the model.

Although I really like the case for its business model, I’m still left with some missing insights on the relation between the MDC’s and the people who actually ship the product to the customer. The case has been documented by many organizations but I have yet to find out about the system by which laborers are remunerated for their work. With CCS having so much control over the pricing, I wonder what efficiencies are employed to maintain margins for the MDC’s…. any thoughts? I have a snippet of evidence on the arm’s-length coordination that takes place with the hawkers here.

The purpose of private sector development

Ask any donor agency, or executing NGO: their role in private sector development is temporary.  “We scan the situation, we design an intervention to nudge an economic system, and exit once we have the ball rolling”.

But the reality of executing private sector development projects is that this premise is lost somewhere along the line. “We don’t fully comprehend the situation, we create a big promise, which seems to make sense on paper, and we actually couldn’t tell at what point we think we have achieved our goal”.

So here’s something I have been meaning to write for a long time, something which might help bridge this gap between intent and action. The purpose of a private sector development project is not to deliver impact on people, planet and profit (ppp). How could a 4 to 5 year stint ever deliver a tangible social and environmental result? Yes, your impact evaluation might show that the project delivers impact, but that only indicates what is feasible given the input you have provided. But what does that mean for the long-term business viability of your idea, and is your idea desirable enough for your intended entrepreneurial audience to take over, once the impact has been demonstrated?

Rather than focusing on the results of a project, I propose to take a different perspective on the purpose of private sector development. The task of a private sector development project is to create a temporary organizational vehicle, which is geared to search for the new business model that will deliver replicable and scalable ppp impact. In other words, it’s not the impact itself we’re after, it’s the business model that will deliver the impact. Private sector development, as a complementary coalition of for-profit, and non-profits, should limit its resources to validating such a model, ie. a feasible, viable, and desirable model. Exit comes after such validation.

Over-focusing on the results agenda in development is harmful to private sector development. It assumes PSD projects already know what they need to execute on. It’s a promise, which seems to be necessary to make all the time to obtain funding, but it’s a promise that will never hold. The reality is that every PSD project on day 1, is faith-based initiative. If you neglect that fact, then you will be tracking reality throughout your project.

Rather, give yourself time in your private sector development project, time to:

  1. focus on your targeted demographic
  2. immerse yourself into the nature of the problems you aim to tackle
  3. prototype, and iterate to validate solutions

Gear your impact assessment to metrics that validate your new business model: execution will take care of itself thereafter.